Are you underexposed?
Ever heard this term before?
It’s most often used to describe an image that lacks the light required to make out the details of a scene.
With no exposure, focus does nothing.
With too little exposure, focus makes very little difference.
With enough exposure, focus transforms vague to vivid.
So what point am I trying to make here?
New output can’t happen without new input.
Be wary of answers from people that don’t ask any questions.

Yours inquisitively,
Jack Butcher
Twitter: @jackbutcher
Instagram: @jckbtchr
